ewx: (Default)
[personal profile] ewx
[Poll #951035]

My back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that the break-even point is around £18,600: you win by about 2p on every pound you earn above that, and lose below it.

There are benefits changes at the bottom end which presumably ameliorate the doubling of 10% rate to some extent (e.g. working tax credit) but I'm afraid I don't know how those benefits work, so if you're affected by those you'll have to work it out yourself.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-21 03:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] naath.livejournal.com
If you're right I win by about 60 pounds a year.

I like the ISA raise, I assume that applies from this April?

And the Inheritance tax threshold is a long overdue rise given real estate prices. Although I'm not generally in favour of inheritance, so I'm not sure I like that much.

Selling off student debt was rumoured, but I can't see if it is true...

(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-21 03:08 pm (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com
The income tax and ISA changes come in for 08/09. Table 1.2 in this PDF (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/21_03_07_budget_report.pdf) has a good summary.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-21 03:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] naath.livejournal.com
I was trying to cheat and read the bbc interpretation...

(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-21 03:28 pm (UTC)
aldabra: (Default)
From: [personal profile] aldabra
I saw something that said the selling off student debt is true. Maybe in the FT.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-21 03:35 pm (UTC)
ext_3375: Banded Tussock (Default)
From: [identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com
'Selling off' Student Loans is a done deal, but you'll see very little of that: it's a securitisation, raising bonds on the open market secured against the income from graduates' repayments.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-21 03:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] naath.livejournal.com
Are the new owners of the debt going to be able to change the terms of the repayment though?

I'm aware of the normal process of selling of debt in this way (I'm reading Stevenson, and Eliza has explained it all in very short words for the reader's benefit)... but this is debt that *I* owe, so I'm naturally more worried about it *grin*.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-21 04:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hsenag.livejournal.com
No, they can't change the terms.
(deleted comment)

(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-21 04:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] naath.livejournal.com
ah. good.

(no subject)

Date: 2007-03-21 04:28 pm (UTC)
ext_3375: Banded Tussock (Default)
From: [identity profile] hairyears.livejournal.com
No. Securitisation doesn't work that way... However, a transfer of the management to a third party might: it isn't clear what the SLC is actually going to do, and they might transfer the right to set the terms of future loans out of the hands of the Sec State for Education.

Nor is it clear what happens if the bonds default: the bondholders sometimes acquire the authority to replace the administrators of a failed asset-backed securities' collateral pool. However, that's a management issue which would probably manifest itself in the pursuit of arrears: the assets in the pool (namely: your loans) would remain the same - same interest, same repayment terms. The 'tail' of derivative securities does not wag the pool of assets, even if they do indeed turn out to be dogs.

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
OSZAR »