ewx: (edna)
[personal profile] ewx

If the worst should happen, and ITV were dismantled or taken over by an overseas company with less of an obligation to create British programmes, it would leave a huge hole. That really is thinking the unthinkable.

Would it? Frankly I'm not sure I'd notice. The last thing I watched on ITV was Law And Order UK which they stopped showing half way through the series without any announcement as to when or whether the rest will appear. (You might think it would be a better fit on C5 anyway given that's where the US versions show.) I can't remember what would have been the previous thing, and I mostly watch C5 and (to a lesser extent) the BBC.

It would of course help if they didn't, apparently uniquely among TV stations, try to stop you finding out what they were showing.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-13 10:16 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldbloke.livejournal.com
Hmmmm. Now you mention it, I'm not sure if we ever watch owt from ITV in this house.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-14 07:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] k425.livejournal.com
Miss Marple!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-13 10:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] meirion.livejournal.com
Since the best thing I've watched this year was originally on BBC 4, and was Swedish, and since I can't watch ITV on an iPlayer-like equivalent, why should I care? Although I suppose "overseas" probably means "American" which isn't a great draw ...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-13 10:27 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pndc.livejournal.com
Given it's a BBC News article, the unthinkable thing might be that if ITV were replaced, they might have some serious competition.

It would certainly be nice if BBC News got a boot up its arse and stopped just recycling newswires, press releases and blogs.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-13 06:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knell.livejournal.com
Huh? If you mean news.bbc, it has plenty of competition, but it isn't from ITV (well, ITN). It's from things like the Guardian website and the other newspapers which have really got into the online thing, as opposed to the Murdoch strategy of whining about it and pretending you're going to get people to voluntarily pay to be given access to a news website. They have more competition than ever before, too, in the shape of news aggregators and other online providers like CNN. However, that's the online space, not broadcast.

In the realm of television news, as far as I know ITN is still a benchmark news provider - the system where ITN and BBC News kept each other honest seemed to work out pretty well. They've maybe dumbed down a bit over the last decade or so and become a bit more populist and tabloidy, but then again so's everyone.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-13 10:31 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rochvelleth.livejournal.com
Back when they showed the first half of Law and Order UK, they said the second half would be shown in the autumn. It's been recommissioned for a second series, so I assume we will get to see it sometime!

I'm a big fan of British drama and watch a lot of ITV shows, so actually I probably would miss it, but I may well be in a minority :)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-13 10:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] armb.livejournal.com
I can't remember what the last ITV thing I watched was, but I'm fairly sure I would have recorded it and skipped the adverts. Which probably explains the 'pleaded with the government to let it make money from "product placement"'.

(As someone I can't remember said, I'm extrapolating from my own experience here, but everyone does that.)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-13 12:22 pm (UTC)
pm215: (Default)
From: [personal profile] pm215
ITV show the Tour de France on ITV4. If they went foom it might get picked up by Sky rather than another freeview channel, which would be a shame. Other than that...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-13 06:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] knell.livejournal.com
Better coverage on Eurosport (with David Harmon and the taciturn-yet-still-not-bad-at-commentating Sean Kelly) if you can get it, not least because the commentators who do the coverage for ITV are also providing the commentary for Versus in the USA, so lots of talking about Lance..

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-13 01:13 pm (UTC)
gerald_duck: (eye)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
*shrug*

I think the only broadcast television I've watched in the past decade has been stuff on new years' eves plus the occasional election of an Obama. I find myself indifferent to the fate of ITV, and don't mind what happens to the BBC as long as news.bbc.co.uk survives.

PS

Date: 2009-09-13 01:14 pm (UTC)
gerald_duck: (mallard)
From: [personal profile] gerald_duck
…though, if the BBC returned to making stuff of the calibre of Life on Earth and Monty Python I might reconsider.

Re: PS

Date: 2009-09-13 02:12 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] nunfetishist.livejournal.com
They make plenty of stuff that good; you just have to find it in the 8-channel ocean of dross. They still do comedy very well, and the natural history programs are great in HD and muted.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-13 02:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] oldbloke.livejournal.com
Quick trawl through the RT gives:
Lewis, Marple, cycling, and some re-runs of old stuff that I might watch if I had nowt else to do, which isn't the case. Can't count films coz they turn up everywhere eventually. And Lewis and Marple are take-it-or-leave-it stuff.
... of course CITV has Jungle Run

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-13 02:58 pm (UTC)
fanf: (silly)
From: [personal profile] fanf
You mean you don't watch Coronation Street???!?!?!

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-13 03:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gjm11.livejournal.com
The bleb.org link seems to be dead, at least for me.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-13 03:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sphyg.livejournal.com
They do the best detective shows. Or they did, and now just repeat them all.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-13 09:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dave holland (from livejournal.com)
I can't remember the last thing I watched on ITV...

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-14 08:57 am (UTC)
lnr: Halloween 2023 (Default)
From: [personal profile] lnr
I enjoyed the recent Wuthering Heights adaptation, but forgot to watch the new Miss Marple. Mostly if we watch real telly (rather than DVDs) it's either Scuzz or More 4 (Time Team and Grand Designs repeats :)

Oh, and the football. World Cup qualifier on ITV and Women's European cup final on BBC2 last week.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-14 10:05 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
(Is this where it's at, now?)

Wasn't Law and Order: UK abandoned because it was crap, something which could have been predicted in advance simply by considering the Chibnall Factor?

Last thing I watched on ITV was either 'Primeval', which wasn't half bad (it was a squillion times better than any of the BBC's attempts to fill the early-Saturday slot during non-'Doctor Who' months, anyway) or Lost in Austen which similarly was quite good.

Apparently 'The Fixer' isn't bad, though I haven't seen it myself. Personally I find it reassuring to know that ITV is there, even if I don't watch it, making sure that the BBC isn't the only game in town. Ben Stephenson already has almost-supreme power; I can't believe it would help, culturally, to crown him Actual King of Fucking Everything, would it?

Here's an interesting article on ITV which hovers between a defence and an analysis of its problems (the accounting stuff in particular is whacked out):

http://tinyurl.com/nnxhvp

S.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-14 10:20 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com

The accounting thing does seem rather bizarre. [livejournal.com profile] rochvelleth says above that L+O UK is coming back in the autumn though evidently I missed the announcement myself.

I'd agree that keeping the BBC ‘honest’ is a useful thing, though that article rather suggests that throwing money at ITV may not be a very effective way to do it.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-14 10:30 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
The question is, if ITV goes down, what will replace it? I can't see another broadcaster being founded with public service obligations, so the gap is likely to be plugged by out-and-out commercial broadcasters like Sky or Virgin 1, and do you think that the BBC is going to feel in the least bit threatened by the home-grown output of either of them in any department other than pure entertainment -- news, drama, comedy, arts?

Also, more worryingly, as a fair chunk of Channel 4's funding comes from ITV (as part of ITV's public-service obligation), it's possible that ITV's collapse might well hole it below the waterline. No more Peep Show, Skins, anything like Red Riding, no more Film4, not to mention the up-and-coming-talent strands that 4 does from time to time.

S.

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-14 10:54 am (UTC)
ext_8103: (Default)
From: [identity profile] ewx.livejournal.com

Well, yes, the point is more that the article implies ITV would need a fair amount of internal reform (e.g. the accounting thing) to be able to make good use of extra income, and if they can't or won't do that then who's going to want to give them the money?

As for Channel 4...

I can't remember the last time I watched anything on 4, either. Slightly odd since I'm sure I remember finding it being the most consistently interesting channel (but that was probably 15-20 years ago now; my TV watching fell sharply in hours/week when I went to university and only really recovered at all relatively recently).

Film Four (as in the movie making, not the channel), now that I can see would be worth keeping, except I see it's been severely cut back anyway.

(Of course funding channel 4 wouldn't be an argument for subsidizing ITV so much as an argument for subsidizing channel 4 directly. But fixing ITV might imply things other than a direct subsidy, of course - indeed I hope it would; two publicly funded broadcasters would seem like a bit of an extravagance. Although I suppose it might be worth it for the outrage from the Murdoch clan.)

(no subject)

Date: 2009-09-14 10:59 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Oh, I'm not in favour of topslicing. you could say that I'm willing to go to any lengths to save ITV short of giving them any actual money...

Skins surprised me by being absolutely, utterly, brilliant. It annoys because it is everything that's wrong with the modern world, and morally of course it appalls me, but it's just amazingly well-constructed.

(I watch a lot more on Channel 4 than I've mentioned but mostly imports, and this is about programme-making not buying-in. But 4 have bought Generation Kill so I eagerly await that).

S.

February 2025

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728 

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
OSZAR »