NHS Summary Care Records opt-out
May. 10th, 2010 08:50 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So to get started all you have to do is correctly enter a NINETY-FIVE CHARACTER URL…
(That's http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/scr/staff/aboutscr/comms/pip/noscr.pdf for anyone who’d like to save themselves the trouble. Obviously you should check I’m giving you the right URL though.)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-10 10:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-10 10:45 pm (UTC)On the other hand, that form is the top hit if you Google "scr optout form".
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-10 10:57 pm (UTC)Perhaps direct.gov should offer a mnemonic URL-shortening service!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-10 11:07 pm (UTC)I can't help thinking that domain names/URLs are a tiny bit of an irrelevance when you're trying to find information; but they do carry some sense of value/correctness/importance when trying to evaluate the information that a search turns up.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-11 02:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-11 10:23 pm (UTC)Apparently a colleague was asked to find the form by a neighbour who wasn’t very computer literate, with copy-typing the URL being the main problem. Obviously I don’t know if they’d have given up or gone with a letter, and I don’t know how widely their experience will be repeated, but I do think there’s a genuine usability problem here and it ought to have been sorted in advance.
Moreover given the amount of bumf you get with the letter, a single extra page for the form would not have been a big deal. So I’m disposed to see the poor usability as basically deliberate.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-11 10:30 am (UTC)Take that as you will.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-11 10:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-11 02:28 pm (UTC)Much as I think the system they've come up with is broken in many ways I'm not going to opt out just as a protest.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-11 02:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-05-11 02:52 pm (UTC)It remains to be seen whether this has worked, of course -- I'll find out in a month or so -- but the value of having records available reliably despite the system being a complete and utter shambles in general is going to have to be something I consider when my GP writes about the SCR. Unfortunately.